Just as before the invasion and occupation of Iraq when the Bush administration was discrediting UN inspectors and the work of El Baradei and the International Atomic Energy Agency, they are doing it again in Iran.  An article from the AP is below.

Once the US had invaded Iraq, US inspectors found exactly what the UN inspectors and the IAEA had reported, no weapons of mass destruction. 

A US Senate committee has now issued a report publicly acknowledging those facts.

Once again the Bush regime’s strategy is to attack the person or institution with lies and false inferences and then discredit the results of the work.  They do it again and again. 

And again and again, the truth finally comes out, only to be denied or discounted by Bush and his henchmen.

Will we Americans stand for more lies about weapons and invade and occupy yet another country?  Will we stand by as more of our young people are sacrificed and more of our national resources are squandered, as more innocent people are slaughtered, their country devastated by our bombs and our weapons of destruction, some of them illegal under international law? 

Or will we stand up and demand that our President and his appointees tell the truth and that our government comply with international law and respect the sovereignty of other nations? 

Will you stand up and speak out now?

IAEA's Director General Mohamed ElBaradei arrives for the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) 35-nation board of governors meeting, on Tuesday, Sept. 12, 2006, at Vienna's International Center. While contemplating a brief enrichment freeze, Iran still refuses to do so before talks on its nuclear program begin _ a key demand by six world powers backed by the threat of U.N. sanctions, officials said Tuesday. (AP Photo/Hans Punz) 

AP – Tue Sep 12, 5:27 AM ET

By GEORGE JAHN, Associated Press Writer
VIENNA, Austria – A recent House of Representatives committee report on Iran’s nuclear capability is “outrageous and dishonest” in trying to make a case that Tehran’s program is geared toward making weapons, a senior official of the U.N. nuclear watchdog has said.

The letter, obtained by The Associated Press on Thursday outside a 35-nation board meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency, says the report is false in saying Iran is making weapons-grade uranium at an experimental enrichment site, when it has in fact produced material only in small quantities that is far below the level that can be used in nuclear arms.

The letter, which was first reported on by The Washington Post, also says the report erroneously says that IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei removed a senior nuclear inspector from the team investigating Iran’s nuclear program “for concluding that the purpose of Iran’s nuclear program is to construct weapons.”

In fact, the inspector was sidelined on Tehran’s request, and the Islamic republic had a right to ask for a replacement under agreements that govern all states relationships with the agency, said the letter, calling the report’s version “incorrect and misleading.”

“In addition,” says the letter, “the report contains an outrageous and dishonest suggestion that such removal might have been for ‘not having adhered to an unstated IAEA policy barring IAEA officials from telling the whole truth about the Iranian nuclear program.'”

Dated Aug. 12, the letter was addressed to Rep. Peter Hoekstra (news, bio, voting record), chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. It was signed by Vilmos Cserveny, a senior director of the Vienna-based agency.

An IAEA official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to comment on the letter, said it was written “to set the record straight.”

Jamal Ware, a spokesman for the House committee, confirmed they had received the letter and said the chairman had referred it to Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., and Rep. Rush Hold, D-N.J. They will review it and issue a formal response if necessary, he said.

“All IAEA complains about is a photo caption. If you read the report, it’s very clear that what it is saying is that Iran is working to develop the capability to enrich uranium to weapons grade, not that they have done so,” Ware said. “They use a string of adjectives, while not pointing to any substantive criticism of the report. There are areas where we would disagree with them. A disagreement does not make what we say erroneous.”

The dispute was reminiscent of the clashes between the IAEA and Washington over whether Saddam Hussein was trying to make weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear arms. American arguments that Saddam had such covert arms programs were given as the chief reason for invading Iraq and toppling Saddam.

ElBaradei’s criticism of the U.S. standpoint on Iraq and subsequent perceptions that he was soft on Iran in his staff’s investigation of suspicions Tehran’s nuclear activities may be a cover for a weapons program led to a failed attempt last year by Washington to prevent his re-election.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: